Article In Saudi Daily: U.S. Planned, Carried Out 9/11 Attacks – But Blames Others For Them
On the eve of President Obama’s April 2016 visit to Saudi Arabia, the U.S. Congress began debating the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), that would, inter alia, allow the families of victims of the September 11 attacks to sue the Saudi government for damages. Also in April 2016, the New York Times published that a 2002 congressional inquiry into the 9/11 attacks had found that Saudi officials living in the United States at the time had a hand in the plot. The commission’s conclusions, said the paper, were specified in a report that has not been released publicly.
The JASTA bill, which was passed by the Senate on May 17, 2016, triggered fury in Saudi Arabia, expressed both in statements by the Saudi foreign minister and in scathing attacks on the U.S. in the Saudi press. On April 28, 2016, the London-based Saudi daily Al-Hayat published an exceptionally harsh article on this topic by Saudi legal expert Katib Al-Shammari, who argued that the U.S. itself had planned and carried out 9/11, while placing the blame on a shifting series of others – first Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, then Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and now Saudi Arabia. He wrote that American threats to reveal documents that supposedly point to Saudi involvement in 9/11 are part of standard U.S. policy of exposing archival documents to use as leverage against various countries – which he calls “victory by means of archives.”
Following are excerpts from Al-Shammari’s article:
“Those who follow American policy see that it is built upon the principle of advance planning and future probabilities. This is because it occasionally presents a certain topic to a country that it does not wish [to bring up] at that time but [that it is] reserving in its archives as an ace to play [at a later date] in order to pressure that country. Anyone revisiting… [statements by] George H.W. Bush regarding Operation Desert Storm might find that he acknowledged that the U.S. Army could have invaded Iraq in the 1990s, but that [the Americans] had preferred to keep Saddam Hussein around as a bargaining chip for [use against] other Gulf states. However, once the Shi’ite wave began to advance, the Americans wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein, since they no longer saw him as an ace up their sleeve.
“September 11 is one of winning cards in the American archives, because all the wise people in the world who are experts on American policy and who analyze the images and the videos [of 9/11] agree unanimously that what happened in the [Twin] Towers was a purely American action, planned and carried out within the U.S. Proof of this is the sequence of continuous explosions that dramatically ripped through both buildings… Expert structural engineers demolished them with explosives, while the planes crashing [into them] only gave the green light for the detonation – they were not the reason for the collapse. But the U.S. still spreads blame in all directions. [This policy] can be dubbed ‘victory by means of archives.’
“On September 11, the U.S. attained several victories at the same time, that [even] the hawks [who were at that time] in the White House could not have imagined. Some of them can be enumerated as follows:
“1. The U.S. created, in public opinion, an obscure enemy – terrorism – which became what American presidents blamed for all their mistakes, and also became the sole motivation for any dirty operation that American politicians and military figures desire to carry out in any country. [The] terrorism [label] was applied to Muslims, and specifically to Saudi Arabia.
“2. Utilizing this incident [9/11], the U.S. launched a new age of global armament. Everyone wanted to acquire all kinds of weapons to defend themselves and at the same time battle the obscure enemy, terrorism – [even though] up to this very moment we do not know the essence of this terrorism of which the U.S. speaks, except [to say that] that it is Islamic…
“3. The U.S. made the American people choose from two bad options: either live peacefully [but] remain exposed to the danger of death [by terrorism] at any moment, or starve in safety, because [the country’s budget will be spent on sending] the Marines even as far as Mars to defend you.
“Lo and behold, today, we see these archives revealed before us: A New York court accuses the Iranian regime of responsibility for 9/11, and we [also] see a bill [in Congress] accusing Saudi Arabia of being behind it [sic]. This is after the previous Iraqi regime was accused of being behind it. Al-Qaeda and the Taliban were also blamed for it, and we do not know who [will be blamed] tomorrow! But [whoever it is], we will not be surprised at all, since this is the essence of how the American archives, that are civilized and respect freedoms and democracy, operate.
“The nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy… [For example,] after a period during which it did not fight anyone [i.e. following World War II], the U.S. created a new kind of war – the Cold War… Then, when the Soviet era ended, after we Muslims helped the religions and fought Communism on their [the Americans’] behalf, they began to see Muslims as their new enemy! The U.S. saw a need for creating a new enemy – and planned, organized, and carried this out [i.e. blamed Muslims for terrorism]. This will never end until it [the U.S.] accomplishes the goals it has set for itself.
“So why not let these achievements be credited to the American administration, while insurance companies pay for the damages, whether domestic or foreign? This, my dear Arab and Muslim, is the policy of the American archives.”
I was punished severely for the telemetry report. It might be game over for this web site. Practically all hits were replaced with static hits at a static rate and I do not know what has been switched out for people to see instead of what I really posted. All references to the telemetry proving the Egypt Air flight vanished because of now documented Israeli activity in the area got expunged entirely from the web, when posted both by this web site, and others.
We had all better pray to God that Trump gets in, and is what he says he is.
I did the best I could to cause peaceful change by informing people about what is going on, to perhaps scare the perpetrators into being less evil. But no, they just simply holoweb it all, the message is going nowhere. They are leaving no peaceful options for anyone to exploit. It is not only this web site, they have holowebbed ALL OTHERS who even approach a truth that is not first told in the mainstream media.
Yeah, everyone thinks Drudge is great, but what did he ever do that was not officially approved? He will link to Alex, but what other alternative media will he link to? No progress can be made if everything you can post and not get in trouble for comes from an MSM mouthpiece, no matter how damning it might look. It is all calculated and if “they” stay within the formula, they will never lose a single hair.
Post whatever you want, and go viral as long as it is bullshit. What happened here over the Egypt Air flight has spooked me good, the holoweb is down to the fine gradients of deception, simulation, and manipulation. The web is already lost. The truth will never be heard by those who do not already know it.
I might as well say something for those who happen to at least be able to see this page
You might see part of it as I posted it, you might see all, you might see none, you will see what the AI wants you to see, based on your profile I guess. But I think everyone will at least be allowed to see this:
The elite have sucked big time at their trying to get everyone to be a pervert. Yeah, they succeeded with porn, but they are not converting people over to transgender and gay very well. I don’t think many have screwed their dogs either.
We have seen a lot of losses, but to be real, I don’t think people realize just how badly the Jews have sucked at getting everyone to the bottom level of filth. They push the gay agenda constantly with the most amazing psychological weapon possible – the TV, and the streets are not filled with fags. Now they are pushing the pedophile agenda, and yeah, I guess there are pedophiles out there but the only high concentration that is still prominent is in their own religious leadership.
They have not succeeded with the transgender issue either. All of what they have sought, except for the breakup of the family, and destruction of morality at the top level, has failed. People just don’t seem to want to devolve beyond losing the sharp edge, the blade is still there, and can be re-sharpened.
When you consider what we have faced, we in fact have played a winning role. When you see how far down the toliet they really want to take society, we did pretty good, because they would have taken us to absolute child raping dog screwing trangenderized zero individual identity butt plug gaydom for EVERYONE one day one if they could have, and it has been decades and all they did was get men and women to screw around and surf porn for the most part. That is an apocalyptic failure.
You can take it all back with ease, and put them at absolute zero. We don’t have to go along with this.
We were a lot stronger than they ever planned for. And guess what? Their agenda has only succeeded in the least way with only a small segment of the population in the most advanced countries. None of this is flying in Mexico, they can’t win with any of it. There is only ONE transgender in this particular city of 1.4 million people, and everyone knows who it is. Figure that! There is ONE gay community in this city of 1.4 million, and they live in a single run down apartment complex with only 10 units. No one goes there, that’s where the gays are. And “there” is 85 feet of frontage on a back street. With as much as the Jews have pushed the gay agenda even in Mexico, that’s quite a failure. Because let’s face it, men and women simply fit better. The Jews can’t change that.
Now they are going with the “fairness card, and saying that children who grow up in families have a better chance in life than those who do not, so the only way to be fair to children who did not have a family is to take all children away from their parents. I am serious with that – that is the next step.
They are desperate, and they are showing too many cards at once.
They are scared to death with how the people reacted to Trump, and as a result they are showing ALL THEIR CARDS AND FACES by pushing things too hard so they can win before the public smashes them. We now clearly know:
Open pedophilia is what they want. So when they try to dissolve society by dividing men and women, even though you can’t really see the end goal of accepted pedophilia from their start with destroying male/female relationships, they already have shown you that is where they are going, so why let them take the first steps?
Here are their goals, which they have recently shown out of desperation: Total erasure of gender identity. Total acceptance of pedophilia. Total acceptance of taking children away from parents, especially when the parents are perfect. Total erasure of national identities. Total normalization of gender identity reversals. Total acceptance of the bonding of man with animal, both sexually and with genetic manipulation. There are a plethora of other goals they have that you probably know about in addition to this.
In short, they want your identity erased, so you can be herded like a zombie down any path they choose. And since they have had such a hard time accomplishing this with the television, they are trying to do this in the schools. And many parents are aware of this, which puts their efforts in the school under scrutiny, which slows them down even there.
They are on the cusp of losing. And they will lose if people stand their ground and dig in now. Don’t let Trump lose to a stolen election. Yeah, they stole the election in Austria, they will steal elections everywhere they can, DO NOT let them steal it this time in America. They can’t win if they allow the will of their subjects to prevail. They have to hijack everything, including political process and policy to achieve their goals. Trump is going to be what it takes to stall them just long enough to lose it all. They are freaked out for a reason.
And I don’t need to tell you that it is all about luciferianism and satan, and destroying the natural order, do I? you already know that if you are one of the few who can break through the holoweb and even see this. We are, I believe, witnessing Satan losing the battle he was supposed to win as stated in scripture. To win at this point, the Jewish community is going to have to get violent, because they are clearly not being effective enough with peaceful means. Too many people are onto it all now, and will not give in well enough to fulfill scripture. We have a lot more than 144,000 people in this world who are totally dug in and going nowhere towards Satan. And they see that as the most serious threat.
The bible is clear about an very important point: The book of Revelations will only come true if people allow it to happen. We have the option to turn back the tide of Jewish perversion and make it all not come true. Lots of it has come true. Enough to confirm it all real. But we do not have to take the final steps, and throw all but 144,000 into the abyss. Where would you rather be? You can go there easily, and be in the company of millions.
THE GOLDEN CALF OF ZIONISM
“About the cries coming from your country, we should know that all the Allied nations are spilling much of their blood, and if we do not sacrifice any blood, by what right shall we merit coming before the bargaining table when they divide nations and lands at the war’s end? For only with blood shall we get the land.”
The cold, calculating, ambitious words of the above quote illustrate what was the willingness of Zionist Marxism to participate in the suffering of the Jews for the purpose of furthering their cause. These demonic sentiments are none other than those which were enunciated by representatives of the World Zionist Congress, the most powerful Zionist group in the world at the time. It was a response sent to Michael Ben Weissmandl, a Rabbi who, after being taken prisoner by the Nazis in Slovakia, worked out an arrangement with his captors for the release of tens of thousands of Jews upon payment in the amount of $50,000.00 to officials of the Third Reich. The response he received from Nathan Shwalb, representative of the World Zionist Congress, clearly shows what was a deliberate effort, on the part of Marxist Zionism, to participate in the suffering of European Jewry for the purposes of increasing their leverage and power. In addition to this, it has been chronicled with equal clarity the cooperation that took place between the Third Reich and the leaders of the Zionist movement for the transfer of almost 1 million Jews to the now infamous death camps in return for the release of a few thousand who were ardent followers of Zionism and considered to be good prospects for the future state of Israel. In addition to these and other nauseating depictions of betrayal and duplicity, the history of the event also reveals what was the involvement of Zionism in acts of terrorism and murder, manifested in bombings of Synagogues and assassinations against anti-Zionist Jews, acts which were then exploited for their propagandistic value in driving Jews into the protective, loving arms of Zionism.
The people who closed the doors of escape to OLD-SICK-YOUNG POLISH Jews who later went up in smoke as a result, were ZIONISTS!
The Zionists only wanted young, healthy Zionists to go to Palestine. They didn’t want the old, sick, young Polish Orthodox Jews crowding into Palestine and they didn’t want them going to other countries. So they got Rabbi Wise & CO to boycott Germany & that turned the German people against the Jews who were left in Germany, mostly Polish Orthodox Jews who couldn’t escape.
THE FINAL SOLUTION:
This Plot was masterminded by Zionist Jews & carried out by demonic German Nazis & Marrano Nazi Jews.
THE JEWISH BRAINS BEHIND THE HOLOCAUST
THEODOR HERZL, THE FOUNDER OF ZIONISM
The term “Zionism” was first introduced in 1893 by Nathan Birmbaum, but Theodor Herzl, an Austrian Jew born to a prosperous, emancipated Budapest family, is recognized as the founder of the Zionist ideology when he published his book in 1896, “The Jewish State”, where he declared that the cure for Anti-Semitism was the establishment of a Jewish state. As he saw it, the best place to establish this state was in Palestine.
While Herzl claimed that the establishment of a “Jewish” state would cure Anti-Semitism, he also promoted Anti-Semitism to further his cause.
Herzl stated in his diary:
“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews.. . become worse. . . this will assist in realization of our plans. . .I have an excellent idea. . . I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . . The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-Semites shall be our best friends”. (From his Diary, Part I, pp. 16)
Benny Morris (the Israeli Historian), described how Herzl foresaw how Anti-Semitism could be “HARNESSED” for the realization of Zionism. He stated:
“Herzl regarded Zionism’s triumph as inevitable, not only because life in Europe was ever more untenable for Jews, but also because it was in Europe’s interests to rid the Jews and relieved of Anti-Semitism: The European political establishment would eventually be persuaded to promote Zionism. Herzl recognized that Anti-Semitism would be HARNESSED to his own–Zionist-purposes.” (Righteous Victims, p. 21)
MISHNAH. HE WHO GIVES OF HIS SEED TO MOLECH INCURS NO PUNISHMENT UNLESS HE DELIVERS IT TO MOLECH AND CAUSES IT TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE. IF HE GAVE IT TO MOLECH BUT DID NOT CAUSE IT TO PASS THROUGH THE FIRE, OR THE REVERSE, HE INCURS NO PENALTY, UNLESS HE DOES BOTH.
Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 437
Following the Mishnah is a discussion among the sages. One of the Talmud Sages, Rabbi Ashi, comments as follows:
GEMARA. R. Ashi propounded: What if one caused his blind or sleeping son to pass through, (3) or if he caused his grandson by his son or daughter to pass through? — One at least of these you may solve. For it has been taught: [Any men … that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall he put to death … And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people;] because he hath given of his seed unto Molech. Why is this stated? — Because it is said, there shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire. From this I know it only of his son or daughter. Whence do I know that it applies to his son’s son or daughter’s son too? From the verse, [And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man] when he giveth of his seed unto Molech [and kill him not: Then I will … cut him off.]
— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin 64b
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 439
Rabbi Dr. Freedman, one of the translators of the Soncino Tractate Sanhedrin, clarifies the passage. In a footnote, Rabbi Dr. Freedman confirms that the Talmud Sages use “seed” to denote living children, in the same sense as the Biblical translators understand the term in the above Biblical quotes. In this footnote, Rabbi Dr. Freedman paraphrases the question from Rabbi Ashi:
3. Is ‘thou shalt not cause to pass’ applicable only to a son who can naturally pass through himself, but not to a blind or sleeping son, who must be led or carried, or does it apply to all?
Rabbi Dr. Freedman
Other footnotes within the same context clarify the fine point of distinction being drawn in the Mishnah and subsequent debates among the sages:
5. Lev. XVIII, 21. This proves that the offence consists of two parts; (I) formal delivery to the priests, and (2) causing the seed to pass through the fire.
Rabbi Dr. Freedman (2)
5. As two separate offences, proving that giving one’s seed to Molech is not idolatry. The differences [sic] is, that if one sacrificed to Molech, or caused his son to pass through the fire to some other deity, he is not punished.
Rabbi Dr. Freedman (3)
Following the Mishnah, Sanhedrin 64a and 64b contain a rousing debate between the Sages concerning:
* the circumstances under which worshipping an idol is idolatry,
* which idols may be worshipped without indulging in idolatry,
* which parts of child sacrifice in what combination are punishable, and
* how children may be sacrificed without violating Leviticus.
THE TRICK IS, YOU GET THE GOYIM TO DO THE HOLOCAUST AND THEN BLAME THEM FOR CAUSING THE HOLOCAUST!
JEWS SHOULD READ Exodus 32; 1 KINGS 11:1-11; AMOS 5:22-27!
AND CHRISTIANS SHOULD ALSO READ Acts 7:42-43.
HITLER & NAZISM A ZIONIST CREATION
“The Second World War is being fought for the defense of the fundamentals of Judaism.”
(Statement by Rabbi Felix Mendlesohn, Chicago Sentinel, October 8, 1942).
“World War II was a Zionist plot to make way for the foundation of the Jewish State in Palestine.”
(Joseph Burg, an anti-Zionist Jew).
According to Wikipedia a Nasi was the highest-ranking member and president of the Sanhedrin and the Romans recognized the nasi as ‘Patriarch of the Jews’.
The Treaty of Versailles was hijacked by Jewish international financiers to create the necessary economic, social, and political and conditions necessary for Hitler to exploit.
Lloyd George told the New York journal American of June 24th 1924:
“The international bankers dictated the Dawes reparations settlement. The protocol which was signed between the allies and associated powers and Germany is the triumph of the international financier. Agreement would never have been reached without the brusque and brutal intervention of the international bankers. They swept statesman, politicians, and journalists to one side, and issued their orders with the imperiousness of absolute Monarchs, who knew there was no appeal from their ruthless decrees. The settlement is the joint ukase of King Dollar and King Sterling. The Dawes report was theirs. They inspired it and fashioned it. The Dawes report was fashioned by the Money Kings. The orders of German financiers [led by the Warburg Bank] to their political representatives were just as peremptory as those of allied bankers to their political representatives.”
Hitler was instructed by German Army Intelligence to spy on The German Workers Party. The head of German Army Intelligence was none other than Max Warburg brother of Paul Warburg, founder of The US Federal Reserve!!! The modus operandi of the Zionists has always been to infiltrate/and or set up groups and political organizations/parties of every description including anti-Semitic:-
“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews. . . become worse. . . this will assist in realization of our plans. . .
I have an excellent idea. . . I shall induce anti-Semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . .
The anti-Semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews.
The anti-Semites shall be our best friends.”
Theodor Herzl, Founder of Zionism in 1897.
“It is from us that the all engulfing terror proceeds. We have in our service persons of all opinions, of all doctrines, monarchists, demagogues, socialists, communists and utopian dreamers of every kind…striving to overthrow all established forms of order. All states are in torture… but we will not give them peace until they openly acknowledge our international Super government…”
The Nazi party was set-up, financed and maintained by Jewish International Financiers. Montagu Norman, governor of the Rothschild-controlled Bank of England, and a close friend of Schacht. In fact they were so close that Schacht named his grandson after him. It was Norman who pressed for and supported the raising of the U.S. interest rates by the Federal Reserve, which was the final push that led to the Wall Street crash, the New Deal, and Franklin D. Roosevelt. Norman was the most influential central banker in the world at that time and his actions, in league with Wall Street, were crucial.
Once Hitler was safely elected, the attitude of the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve to Germany was transformed. Credit was offered to the Nazi regime and after the Nazis successfully invaded Czechoslovakia; Norman released £6 million of Czechoslovakian gold to Hitler, which was deposited in London. This was done with the agreement of the Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain.
On June 11th 1934, and again the following October, Norman and Schacht met in secret at Badenweiler in the Black Forest to arrange loans for Hitler and the Nazis. But who was behind Norman? His family almost turned the Bank of England into their personal property. One grandfather, George Warde Norman, was the governor from 1821-1872 and his other grandfather, Lord Collet, was governor from 1887-1889. Montagu Norman spent a period in the United States at the offices of the Rothschild-funded Brown Brothers (later Brown Brothers, Harriman) and was befriended by the family of W.A Delano, relatives of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the President of the United States at the same time that Norman was head of the Bank of England.
This all-powerful banker was actually a “yes man” for the Rothschild’s, and here again, we see the ploy at work. He was portrayed as anti-Jewish.
Alfred Rosenberg, an occultist with a Jewish, Estonian and French background made a copy of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion available to Hitler. Why would a man with a Jewish background hand to Hitler the very ammunition that would lead to the attempt by his regime at the destruction of a grouping of people we know as the Jews?
When you accept the proven involvement of Jewish bankers and their political representatives to have been very involved in the funding of the Nazis re- armament, you have only two possible answers:
Either Zionists are not Jews or the Zionists wanted a mass persecution of there own people.
Both these answers are true. Many Zionists are not Jewish. Those that were knew that to further the rise and creation of the Zionist State in Palestine, they required an irrefutable need. The gathering Nazi hatred and blame towards the Jewish people for the ills of the world which led to the mass persecution, gave the Zionist elite exactly that.
Ernst Hanfstaengl, a close friend of Franklin Roosevelt, was also a close associate of Hitler before the war, says he was warned by the Austrian writer, Rudolf Kommer that,
“if any political party emerges with an Anti-Semitic programme directed by Jewish or half Jewish fanatics, we shall have to watch out”.
Hanfstaengl wrote that later, after experiencing the influence that Alfred Rosenberg had on Hitler, he began to realize what that remark really meant:
“I thought back to Rudolph Kommer’s remark about an Anti-Semitic programme directed by Jewish or half – Jewish fanatics – Rosenberg was distinctly Jewish in appearance, although he would have been the first to protest furiously if anyone had questioned his ancestry. Yet I used to see him most mornings sitting in a dingy café at the corner of Briennerstrasse and Augustenstrasse with a Hungarian Jew named Holoschi, who was one of his principle assistants. The man called himself Hollander in Germany and was another of these Jewish Anti-Semites…I suspected the Aryan background of many of the others, Strasser and Streicher looked Jewish to me as well as figures like Ley, Frank and even Goebbels, who would have difficulty in proving their pedigree.”
So the creation of hatred towards the Jewish race, then the grotesque treatment that followed Hitler’s decrees, was hyped to enormous proportions to justify the takeover of Palestine for a Jewish Homeland. No one used this method more than Lord Victor Rothschild in his House of Lords speeches urging support for a Jewish State in Palestine. You can see the play by the elite clearly here. To add further to this, Hitler’s book Mein Kampf, was ghost written by Major General Karl Haushofer, who acknowledged that a major source for the ‘ideas’ it expressed came from Halford J. MacKinder, a director of the elite’s London School of Economics.
In 1996, official German documents uncovered by an American student also proved that many of Hitler’s leading officers and thousands of his troops were of Jewish decent. You can now understand why Britain appeased Hitler. The elite had to make sure the re-armament of Germany went un-headed. Only when Hitler’s war machine was ready would the stance of Britain change.
To what degree Hitler was aware of his puppet status?
Was he a willing or unwilling pawn in this Zionist engineered heinous conflict?
Hitler like many leaders of today was surrounded by a Zionist cabal:
– Heydrich, Goebbels, Rosenberg, Streicher and Eichmann.
The Nazis opposed the gold standard. The Nazis opposed the Capitalists and the unregulated private control of land and of loan capital. The Nazis took the Capitalists’ money, but the intent of sincere Nazis was always to use this money to drive Jewish Capitalism from the European Continent forever.
And there were sincere Nazis, Hitler, Goebbels, Heydrich, Eichmann and other Bolshevik Zionists were not among them.
So why did the Nazis, under Hitler’s leadership, and through Gottfried Feder’s tutelage, oppose the Jews’ gold standard; and why did FDR, an agent of Jewish Communism, seize gold for the Jews; if Hitler was working for the Jews, and paper money unencumbered with debt is bad for the Jews?
The Jews wanted a prolonged and devastating Second World War, which would eclipse the carnage and destruction of WW I. There was not nearly enough gold in existence to provide the loan capital needed to finance the war machine required in Germany and America to fund the wartime economies of those nations. So the Jews taught Hitler, through Feder, how to make his own money, how to circulate it, and how to engage in international trade without throwing out all of Germany’s growth into the slop bucket of Jewish usury, nor let the Jews intervene in international trade and harvest the wealth of German production as middlemen.
In this way, the Jews, who also poured money directly into Germany, financed Hitler in order to ultimately destroy Germany, and much of Europe, through Jewish manufactured war. They had done the same with their agent Napoleon Bonaparte, who considered himself to be the Jews’ messiah, who tried to take Palestine for the Jews, who emancipated the Jews, and who was rewarded by the Jews with prison as punishment for promoting good Gentile-Jewish relations, which led to Jewish assimilation–the Jews most hated enemy.
The Zionists were afraid that the “Jewish race” was disappearing through assimilation. They wanted to use anti-Semitism to force the segregation of Jews from Gentiles and to unite Jews, and thereby preserve the “Jewish race”. They hoped that if they put a Hitler-type into power—as Zionists had done in the past, they could use him to herd up the Jews of Europe and force these Jews into Palestine against their will. This would also help the Zionists to inspire distrust of, and contempt for, Gentile government, while giving the Zionists the moral high-ground in international affairs, despite the fact that the Zionists were secretly behind the atrocities.’
Hitler in pre-WWI Austria got heavily into The Occult and became a friend of the Jewish Lanz von Liebensfels author of the anti-Jewish magazine “Ostara” and founder of a secret society called “The Order of The New Templars.”
He also became an admirer of the works of Jewish Occultist Helen Blatavsky and The Theosophical Society. Interestingly enough their symbol has on it a Swastika, Star of David and serpent!
Under the 1935 Nuremberg Laws, only two flags were permitted in Nazi Germany. One was the swastika. The other was the blue and white banner of Zionism. The Zionist party was the only other political party in Nazi Germany that enjoyed a measure of freedom, and could publish a newspaper.
Zionists had a record of cooperation with the Nazis in the 1930’s. They had a trade plan by which German Jews could redeem their property in Nazi goods exported to Palestine. Adoph Eichmann also helped them set up training camps in Europe and even visited Palestine as their guest. In 1935 the steamer “Tel Aviv” made its maiden voyage from Nazi Germany to Haifa with Hebrew letters on its bow and a Nazi flag fluttering from its mast. The Captain of the Zionist-owned ship was a member of the Nazi Party. A passenger described the spectacle as a “metaphysical absurdity.”
Actually it made perfect sense.
The ship transported German Jews who had taken advantage of the “Haavara” program, which allowed them to exchange their money for its value in Germany products in Palestine. As a result, the fledgling Jewish colony received about 70,000 highly educated German Jews and 140 million Reichmarks worth of German industrial equipment. This laid the foundation of Israel’s infrastructure.
Zionists, welcomed the Nazis’ anti Semitic policies. Like the Nazis, they believed in race-based national character and destiny. Like the Nazis, they believed Jews had no future in Germany. The co-operation extended to political and economic spheres. Adolph Eichmann set up agricultural training camps in Austria to prepare young Jews for Kibbutz life. He visited Palestine and conferred with Zionist leaders who confessed their true expansionist goals Think about it. Hitler could have just confiscated all the Jewish wealth. Instead he used the “Haavara Program” to help establish the State of Israel.
On Nov. 25, 1940, a boat carrying Jewish refugees from Nazi Europe, the “Patra,” exploded and sank off the coast of Palestine killing 252 people.
The Zionist “Haganah” claimed the passengers committed suicide to protest British refusal to let them land. Years later, it admitted that rather than let the passengers go to Mauritius it blew up the vessel.
“Sometimes it is necessary to sacrifice the few in order to save the many,” Moshe Sharett, a former Israeli Prime Minister said at memorial service in 1958.
Jack Bernstein in his book ‘An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel stated –
“The Ashkenazi Jews, who migrated to Israel from Germany, while sympathetic to Communism and support it, tend to favor the practices of Nazi-style fascism. During World War II in Germany these elite Zionist Ashkenazi Jews worked closely with Hitler’s Gestapo in persecuting the lower class German Jews and delivering them to concentration camps. Now living in Israel, these elite Zionist Jews, who were well trained in Nazi-style fascism and favor it, have imposed many facets of fascism on Israel.
To give the impression that Israel is a democracy, members of the Knesset (Israel’s Congress) are elected – but it’s an odd kind of election. This is where Israel’s so-called democracy stops. It doesn’t make any difference which party wins an election, the Likud or Labour Party, the elite Zionist Jews rule in a dictatorial manner – giving favours to the elite clique and brutally suppressing any dissent.
Concerning Nazism/Fascism please let me clear a point. Germans are an admirable people – I dare say even great. But in Germany, the general population was victim of the Nazis who through cunning and brutality gained power.
In Germany, the average Jews were victims of the Zionist elite who worked hand in hand with the Nazis. Many of those same Zionist Jews, who, in Germany, had worked with the Nazis, came to Israel and joined hands with the Zionist /Communist Jews from Poland and Russia. It is the two faces of communism and Nazi-style fascism that rule Israel.
Democracy is merely an illusion.”
ZIONISM IS NAZISM:
JEWISH EUGENICS PREDATES HITLER’S MASTER RACE
*** According to the Israeli daily newspaper quoted below, before the Nazi Third Reich in Germany plotted to create a Master Race from the European gene pool, Zionists had already established a racial purification program to create the perfect Jewish bloodline. ***
A shocking new study reveals how key figures in the pre-state Zionist establishment proposed castrating the mentally ill, sterilizing the poor and doing everything possible to ensure reproduction only among the `best of people.’
Castrating the mentally ill, encouraging reproduction among families “numbered among the intelligentsia” and limiting the size of “families of Eastern origin” and “preventing … lives that are lacking in purpose” – these proposals are not from some program of the Third Reich but rather were brought up by key figures in the Zionist establishment of the Land of Israel during the period of the British Mandate. It turns out there was a great deal of enthusiasm here for the improvement of the hereditary characteristics of a particular race (eugenics). This support, which has been kept under wraps for many years, is revealed in a study that examines the ideological and intellectual roots at the basis of the establishment of the health system in Israel.
In the Yishuv (pre-state Jewish community) in the 1930s there were “consultation stations” operating on a Viennese model of advice centers for couples that wished to marry and become parents. In Austria, with the Nazis’ rise to power, they served for forced treatment. Here the stations were aimed at “giving advice on matters of sex and marriage, especially in the matter of preventing pregnancy in certain cases.” They distributed birth-control devices for free to the penniless and at reduced prices to those of limited means. In Tel Aviv the advice stations were opened in centers of immigrant populations: Ajami in Jaffa, the Hatikvah Quarter and Neveh Sha’anan.
These are some of the findings of a doctoral thesis written by Sachlav Stoler-Liss about the history of the health services in the 1950s, under the supervision of Prof. Shifra Shvarts, head of the department of health system management at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. They were presented at the annual conference of the Israel Anthropological Association at Ben-Gurion College.
The father of the theory of eugenics was British scholar Francis Galton. It was he who coined the term – which literally means “well-born” – at the end of the 19th century. The aim of the eugenics movement was to better the human race. Galton proposed a plan to encourage reproduction among “the best people” in society and to prevent reproduction among “the worst elements.”
Between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, Galton drew many followers and his ideas spread rapidly to other countries in Europe (among them Germany, France, Italy, Denmark, Sweden and Belgium), to the United States and to some countries in South America. In various countries laws were passed that allowed for the forced sterilization of “hereditary paupers, criminals, the feeble-minded, tuberculous, shiftless and ne’er-do-wells.” In the United States, up until 1935, about 20,000 people – “insane,” “feeble-minded,” immigrants, members of ethnic minorities and people with low IQs – were forcibly sterilized; most of them in California. The Californian law was revoked only in 1979. According to Dr. Philip Reilly, a doctor and executive director of the Shriver Center for Mental Retardation, in 1985 at least 19 states in the United States had laws that allowed the sterilization of people with mental retardation, (among them Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Minnesota, Mississippi, North and South Carolina, Vermont, Utah and Montana).
“Eugenics is considered to be something that only happened in Germany,” says Stoler-Liss. “Germany was indeed the most murderous manifestation of eugenics, but in fact it was a movement that attracted many followers. In every place it took on a unique, local aspect. It is interesting to note that both in GERMA|NY and in ISRAEL a link was made between eugenics, health and nationalism.”
Stoler-Liss first encountered the eugenics texts of doctors from the Yishuv when looking for instruction books for parents for a research project for her master’s degree.
“I presented a text at a thesis seminar and then the instructor of the workshop said to me, `But why aren’t you saying that this is a translated text?’ I replied: `No, no, the text isn’t translated.’ `In Israel,’ he said, `there are no such things.'”
She decided to look into whether there was only anecdotal and non- representative evidence, doctors and public figures here and there who supported eugenics – and she found many publications that promoted eugenics. Supporters of the idea were key figures in the emerging medical establishment in Palestine; the people who managed and created the Israeli health system.
One of the most prominent eugenicists of the Mandatory period was Dr. Joseph Meir, a well-known doctor who acquired his education in Vienna, served for about 30 years as the head of the Kupat Holim Clalit health maintenance organization, and after whom the Meir Hospital in Kfar Sava is named.
“From his position at the very heart of the Zionist medical establishment in the land of Israel in the mid-1930s, he brought young mothers the gospel of eugenics, warned them about degeneracy and transmitted the message to them about their obligation and responsibility for bearing only healthy children,” says Stoler-Liss.
Thus, for example, in 1934 Dr. Meir published the following text on the first page of “Mother and Child,” a guide for parents that he edited for publication by Kupat Holim:
“Who is entitled to give birth to children? The correct answer is sought by eugenics, the science of improving the race and preserving it from degeneration. This science is still young, but its positive results are already great and important – These cases [referring to marriages of people with hereditary disorders – T.T.] are not at all rare in all nations and in particular in the Hebrew nation that has lived a life of exile for 1,800 years. And now our nation has returned to be reborn, to a natural life in the land of the Patriarchs. Is it not our obligation to see to it that we have whole and healthy children in body and soul? For us, eugenics as a whole, and the prevention of the transmission of hereditary disorders in particular, even greater value than for all other nations! … Doctors, people involved in sport and the national leaders must make broad propaganda for the idea: Do not have children if you are not certain that they will be healthy in body and soul!”
PROBLEMATIC AND DANGEROUS
In its full version, the article, which was published in the “Health Guard” section of the now defunct labor Zionist newspaper Davar, the doctor proposed castrating the mentally ill. Stoler-Liss found many more examples in the “Mother and Child” books that were published in 1934 and 1935 and in journals like Eitanim, which was edited by Dr. Meir.
“The support of Dr. Meir and other senior people in the health system for these ideas has been kept under wraps for many years,” claims Stoler-Liss.
No one today talks about this chapter in the history of the Yishuv. In the mid-1950s Dr. Meir’s articles were collected into a book that came out in his memory. The article mentioned above was not included in it. Stoler-Liss found a card file with notes scribbled by the editors of the volume. They defined the article as “problematic and dangerous.” “Now, after Nazi eugenics,” wrote one of the editors, “it is dangerous to publish this article.”
During the latter part of the 1930s, adds Stoler-Liss, when word came out about the horrors that eugenics in its extreme form is likely to cause, they stopped using this word, which was attributed to the Nazis. Overnight eugenics organizations and journals changed their names and tried to shake off any signs of this theory. Dr. Meir, however, during all the years he was active, continued to promote the ideas of eugenics. At the beginning of the 1950s he published an article in which he harshly criticized the reproduction prize of 100 lirot that David Ben-Gurion promised to every mother who gave birth to 10 children.
“We have no interest in the 10th child or even in the seventh in poor families from the East … In today’s reality we should pray frequently for a second child in a family that is a part of the intelligentsia. The poor classes of the population must not be instructed to have many children, but rather restricted.”
“I’m not making a value judgment,” says Stoler-Liss.
“Zionism arose at a certain period, in a certain ideological atmosphere – there were all kinds of ideas in the air and there were also eugenicist Zionists. Some of the doctors were educated in Europe, and at that time the medical schools taught not only medicine but also the theory of eugenics.”
JUDAISM OF MUSCLE
Dr. Meir was not the first Zionist leader who supported eugenics. According to studies by Dr. Rapahel Falk, a geneticist and historian of science and medicine at Hebrew University, other major Zionist thinkers – among them Dr. Max Nordau, Theodor Herzl’s colleague, a doctor and a publicist, and Dr. Arthur Ruppin, the head of the World Zionist Organization office in the Land of Israel – presented the ideas of eugenics as one of the aims of the Jewish movement for national renewal and the settlement of the land.
Prof. Meira Weiss, an anthropologist of medicine at Hebrew University, describes in her book “The Chosen Body” how the settlement of the land and work on the land were perceived by these Zionist thinkers as the “cure” that would restore the health of the Jewish body that had degenerated in the Diaspora. In Nordau’s terms, a “Judaism of muscle” would replace “the Jew of the coffee house: the pale, skinny, Diaspora Jew. “At a time when many Europeans are calling for a policy of eugenics, the Jews have never taken part in the `cleansing’ of their race but rather allowed every child, be it the sickest, to grow up and marry and have children like himself. Even the mentally retarded, the blind and the deaf were allowed to marry,” wrote Ruppin in his book “The Sociology of the Jews.” “In order to preserve the purity of our race, such Jews [with signs of degeneracy – T.T.] must refrain from having children.”
“Many people dealt with eugenics as a theoretical issue,” says Stoler-Liss. “They even set up a Nordau Club with the aim of researching the racial aspects of the Jewish people and ways of improving it. What was special about Dr. Meir and the group that joined him was that for them eugenics was a very practical matter.”
They wanted to pursue applied eugenics.
The main institution was the advice station. The first station was opened in 1931 in Beit Strauss on Balfour Street in Tel Aviv. The aim was to work in “pleasant ways,” through persuasion and choice. As Stoler-Liss explains:
“Why should people work against their personal interests? It is here that the connection to the national interest comes in. If I understand that by having a baby I will harm the national interest, the building of the land, the `new Jew,’ I will refrain from giving birth. But just to make certain, Meir told the doctors, in the event that a woman comes to you who is `a risk’ for giving birth to a sick baby, it is your obligation to make certain that she has an abortion.”
“Gynecologist Miriam Aharonova also wrote extensively on the subject of eugenics,” adds Stoler-Liss.
“In articles for parents under headings such as `The Hygiene of Marriage’ she gives a list of eugenic instructions for parents – from the recommended age for giving birth (between 20 and 25), to the recommended difference in age between the father and the mother (the reason for which is the betterment of the race) to a list of diseases that could infect the spouse or “be transmitted through heredity to their descendents after them.”
In the diseases, she mentions “syphilis, gonorrhea, tuberculosis, alcoholism, narcotics addiction (fondness for morphine, cocaine, etc.) and diseases of the mind and the nerves.” In the volume of “Mother and Child” published in 1935, says Stoler-Liss, the publication and discussions by doctors who supported eugenics was greatly expanded. Why, in fact, did they not use force? The establishment had a great deal of power over immigrants and refugees.
“The medical establishment’s power was limited at that time. This was an establishment that developed hand in hand with the system it was supposed to strengthen and suffered from constant shortages: a shortage of doctors, a shortage of nurses and a shortage of equipment. It had to examine, treat, inoculate and so on. We are talking about the period of the British Mandate. When at long last there was a state, eugenics theory declined. My explanation is the change of generations: that generation had come to an end professionally, and a new generation with more national motivation came along that was not educated at the European universities during that period. They had already seen what the Nazis had done with it and the ideological identification was lower. The ideas themselves seeped in but they’re not using the same rhetoric.”
HAVE EUGENICS REALLY VANISHED?
The eugenic chapter in the history of Western culture has been closed, but have eugenics really disappeared?
“Eugenic thinking is alive and well today,” asserts Stoler-Liss.
“It is expressed mainly in the very high rate of pre-natal tests and genetic filtering [of genetically deviant fetuses]. Mothers are very highly motivated to give birth only to healthy children and the attitude toward the exceptional, the different and the handicapped in Israeli society is problematic.”
At hospitals today future parents are offered a plethora of genetic tests that diagnose the fetus before birth. Some of them are aimed at identifying serious disorders, like Tay-Sachs disease, a degenerative disease that causes a painful death in infancy. Others, however, are aimed at screening fetuses with conditions like deafness and sterility, the bearers of which can lead full and satisfying lives.
SOURCE: Haaretz, “`Do not have children if they won’t be healthy!'”, By Tamara Traubmann, 11 June 2004.
[ http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/437879.html ]