Globalization Index

Globalisation – One World Conspiracy

"One World or None", "Time is Running
Out": Globalization Index
– Peter Myers, Childers,
Australia, ph. +61 7 41262296. August 31, 2001; update December 31, 2008.
My comments in quoted text are shown {thus}. Write to me at contact.html.

You are at http://mailstar.net/oneworld.html.

The World Government people like to depict their critics as uneducated
and irrational. Fortunately, there are a few Alexander Solzhenitsyns around,
to refute that claim. Bertrand Russell and H. G. Wells were activists in
the World Government movement. The movement was pro-Lenin and Trotsky but
anti-Stalin; that is why it later gave the impression of being anti-Communist.

Globalism (One-Worldism) is promoted by (a) Multi-national Corporations
(against nation-based smaller business) (b) the Trotskyist & Fabian
Left (against the Stalinist Left).

FDR and Pearl Harbor: Day of Deceit, by Robert B. Stinnett. Discloses
the US plan to provoke Japan to fire the first shot, so as to motivate
an isolationist US public to join the war against Germany. US intercepted
Japanese Bomb Plot Grids for Pearl Harbor,
but did not warn Kimmel. Vacant Sea: US
clears shipping out of the path of the Japanese carrier force, to prevent
accidental discovery. Myth of the
radio silence
of the Japanese carrier force. US
moved its aircraft carriers
& modern warships away from Pearl Harbor,
leaving only old ships to be sunk by the Japanese attack.
Perhaps,
out of dire necessity, Roosevelt had to deceive the American people in
order to defeat Hitler. Perhaps the cost of several thousand lives was
justified to bring down a greater evil. But why do we have to keep lying
about it? Why can’t our history books tell what actually happened? pearl-harbor.html.

The National System of Political Economy, by Friedrich List,
1841, translated by Sampson S. Lloyd, 1885. About 935 KB (download): List-National-System.doc.

There are good reasons for world unity; but who will rule? Why should
we trust the OneWorlders, when they try to suppress from public knowledge
much of the historical information provided here, and elsewhere in this
site? They – the apologists of the Open Society – are far from Open themselves.

The One World Or None report of 1946. In 1946, only the
U.S. had the Atomic Bomb. In this report, scientists and journalists tell
us that, to prevent nuclear wars, we need a World Government: one-world-or-none.html.
The Baruch Plan for World Government was put to Stalin in that year: baruch-plan.html.

Leo Szilard and H.G. Wells, founders of the Green Left. Leo Szilard
helped create the first nuclear chain reaction, and initiated the letter
to Roosevelt that got the Manhattan Project under way. Later, he warned
of the dangers of nuclear weapons, and joined Wells’ crusade for World
Government: szilard.html.

Claims that the One-World conspiracy is "British":
british-conspiracy.html. A graphic
overview called One World Conspiracy – "British" or "Jewish"?
A Jewish one inside the British one
, depicting the three factions of
the "One World" conspiracy, is at british-conspiracy.gif.
Feel free to make copies and transparencies of it.

(1) Free Trade is a means to World Government

F. William Engdahl on how the British Empire adopted Free Trade in the
Nineteenth Century: A Century of War.

Richard Cobden was one of the earliest leaders of the Free Trade movement
in Britain during the 1800s. The Repeal of the Corn Laws allowed cheaper
American grain to flood Britain, forcing farm workers to flee to the cities.
Cobden saw the main benefit of Free Trade as political, not economic: Cobden:
Free Trade is about creating a World State
.

John Locke, philosopher of the "Glorious" English Revolution
of 1688, which first put Britain in the clutches of the bankers (up to
then, based in Amsterdam, after their expulsion from Spain), is a major
"mentor" of the "Free Trade" movement and "English
Parliamentianism". Here, the real John Locke
is disclosed
.

Karl Marx advocated Free Trade (Capitalism) not for its own sake, but
because it creates opportunities for social revolution: Marx
on Free Trade
.

Trotskyists advocate Free Trade for the same reason: How
the Trotskyists Led the Australian Labour Party Up the Free-Trade Path
.

Karl Popper against Capitalism (Laissez-Faire): The
Open Society and Its Capitalist Enemies
.

George Soros against Capitalism (Laissez-Faire); what next? soros2.html.

Werner Sombart, The Jews and Modern Capitalism (1911): sombart.html.

The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America,
by Patrick S. J. Carmack and Bill Still: money-masters.html.

Financing Sustainable Development, by John H. Hotson; Banana Republic?
No, Banana Colony, by Dr H. C. Coombs.: money.html.

F.D.R.: My Exploited Father-in-Law, by Curtis B. Dall: fdr.zip.

Sir James Goldsmith argues against Free Trade, in his book The Trap.
The front cover asks, "How is it that humanity’s greatest leap
forward in material prosperity has resulted in extreme social breakdown?"

Also presents the case against modern Agriculture, the EU, and the homogenization
of the sexes: goldsmith.html.

Strobe Talbott, deputy Secretary of State in Clinton’s 1st and
2nd administrations, puts the case for World Government:
cobden.html.

Michael Hudson on tax havens ("Offshore Banking Centers"):

A "foreign investor" is likely to be a local oligarch operating
out of an offshore account. The complicity of the US Government in setting
up such centres. "Much of America’s net foreign debt, along
with that of countries such as Argentina, is owed to these flight-capital
centers
." They provide "a cloak of invisibility for the wealth
built up by embezzlers, tax evaders, a few drug dealers, arms dealers and
government intelligence agencies to use for their covert operations."
How they increase the tax burdon on ordinary people. How they can be shut
down. tax-havens.html.

(2) Attempts at World Government: The League of Nations, the Baruch
Plan

Articles 10-16 of the the Covenant of the League of Nations provided
for a World Army: Documents of the 20th Century.

Extracts from the first Soviet Constitution, the Russian
Constitution of 1918
.

The complete USSR Constitution of 1924, committed to World Federalism
(federating all countries within the USSR)
: USSR
Constitution 1924
.

The 1946 Baruch Plan for World Government: baruch-plan.html.

Andrei Sakharov on East-West Convergence towards World Government
(World Federalism) – How Anatoliy  Golitsyn garbled the story, and
how his misinterpretation is being taken up in the United States by George
W. Bush: convergence.html.

Walter Lippman shows how "Colonel" House, liasing with
Lord
(Sir Edward) Grey of the Anglo (Rhodes) conspiracy, persuaded
Woodrow Wilson to join World War I
. Lippman wanted the League of Nations
to be a World Government with a World Army and a World Court. His book
Men of Destiny is a collection of articles on these themes, originally
published in various journals including Foreign Affairs: lippmann.html.

Arnold J. Toynbee argues the case for World Government: "Abolishing
war would involve setting up at least a rudimentary world-government.
The first world-authority that it would be necessary for us to establish
– and, of course, also to endow with effective power – would be a central
agency for controlling
the production and the use of atomic energy.
… " toynbee.html.

(3) Writings of the Anglo-American Establishment

The Will of Cecil Rhodes, endowing a Secret Society to run the British
Empire and draw the United States back in
. The British Empire is now
called the British Commonwealth. Rhodes’ Secret Society is called the
Round Table; its American branch is the Council on Foreign Relations

(CFR). The CFR set up the Trilateral Commission to co-ordinate North America,
Western Europe and Japan: rhodes-will.html

Cecil Rhodes’ Imperialism and the Rhodes Scholarships for World Governance:
rhodes-scholars.html

Carroll Quigley exposes the Secret Society which largely ran the British
Empire (and now largely runs the British Commonwealth and the United States),
and which has also been trying to create a World Government (this is the
"top-level" "Anglo" Conspiracy, through which, I argue,
another, even more secret one operates): The Anglo-American
Establishment
.

In Tragedy and Hope, he writes, "I know of the operations
of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted
for two years
, in the early 1960’s, to examine its papers and secret
records
. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have,
for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. …
my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown,
and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known
"
(p. 950): Tragedy and Hope.

Lionel Curtis on why the British Empire should re-incorporate the United
States and become a World State: The Commonwealth
of Nations
(1911-16)

More from Lionel Curtis Civitas Dei: The Commonwealth
of God
(1938).

A number of important members of the Anglo-American Establishment participated
in the Coefficients Club, organized by Beatrice Webb of the Fabian Society
to promote Socialism within the Empire. Their concept of Socialism would
be called "fascism" by today’s Fabians: most Fabians then supported
the Empire, the Boer War and World War I. But a minority envisaged a world
run by a meritocracy drawn from all races, and supported the Bolshevik
Revolution; this group included H. G. Wells and Bertrand Russell. Their
faction seems dominant in the Fabians today.

H. G. Wells wrote a book called The Open Conspiracy, which
was his name for the movement for World Government
. See H.G. Wells,
The Open Conspiracy (the movement for World Government)
and H.G. Wells, 4 other H.G. Wells books promoting
World Government
.

Karl Popper wrote a book called The Open Society. Is the Open
Society – the borderless world – also the Open Conspiracy? Open
Society, Open Conspiracy

The head of the Open Society Foundation is speculator George Soros,
the public face of the Rothschilds. What’s "Open" about Tax Havens,
where the world’s rich hide their money, and from which they control the
countries in debt to them? Does the foreign debt of all countries add up
to zero? If the foreign debt of all countries at, say, 30 June each year
is not published, where’s the "Openness"? If money-creation in
Capitalism is based on fraud, on deception of the public, if the foreign
debt of most countries has been created by dishonest means, why should
the debt not be repudiated?

Bertrand Russell and H. G. Wells were activists in the World Government
movement. The movement was pro-Lenin and Trotsky but anti-Stalin; that
is why it later gave the impression of being anti-Communist.

The Trotskyist/Fabian version of Communism is alive and well. Open-border
immigation, casual relationships treated as equivalent to marriage, parents
afraid of being "dobbed in" to the government … the wreckage
of family life was brought to the West from the pre-Stalin period of the
Soviet Union.

In the early (Trotskyist) period of the Soviet Union, marriage was abolished,
polygamy was abolished (this mainly affected the Islamic cultures of Central
Asia), and homosexuality was legalised. Stalin restored marriage, gave
advantages to married women over unmarried women, and made sodomy a crime.

The Russian Revolution was an invasion led by non-theistic Jews, pretending
to represent the Working Class. Stalin got power partly because he was
not a Jew. Eventually he turned the tables on those who had introduced
such terror; in 1953 he was murdered as that clash flared once more.

Stalin was no hero, but he stole the conspiracy, preventing a link-up
between the Soviet and Western forces for World Government, as proposed
in the 1946 Baruch Plan.

H. G. Wells saw the end of World War I as an opportunity to create a
new world. He supported both Lenin, and
the attempt to create a World Government at the Treaty of Versailles. He
also advocated the creation of a Jewish state
. His ideas for a united
world drew on Jewish thought, in discussions with David Lubin and Israel
Zangwill.

Until recently I was puzzled why Lenin opposed the Treaty of Versailles
powers, when I thought Wells & his friends had supported that Treaty.

Wells wanted it to create a World Government, with a World Army and a World
Court.

David C. Smith explains in his biography H. G. Wells: Desperately
Mortal
(pp. 240-2), that Wells &
his associates felt that the Treaty of Versailles was a failure, because
a World Government had not been created
. Their opponents were the "Tory"
faction of the British Empire, plus American nativism.

Russell observed the despotism set up by Lenin and Trotsky. In the late
1940s, he reproduced in his autobiography a letter he wrote in 1920 attesting
to it. In that letter to Ottoline Morrell, Russell
confirms that the early Bolshevik regime was a tyranny set up by Americanised
Jews
.

See the Unwin paperback, The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell,
1975, p. 354; in the hardback edition, the second of three volumes, The
Autobiography of Bertrand Russell 1914-1944
, p. 172.

Russell saw the situation first-hand when he visited Russia shortly
after the Revolution. Yet in his book about the new regime, The Practice
and Theory of Bolshevism
, published in 1920 soon after his visit to
Russia, he makes no mention of the Jewish connection; in the Preface of
that book he even wrote, "The Russian Revolution is one of the great
heroic events of the world’s history" (Unwin paperback, London 1962,
p. 7).

Why omit the Jewish connection?

Because he was basically sympathetic to Marxism – he wanted it to work.
In his book Roads to Freedom, published in 1918 before he had visited
Bolshevik Russia, he wrote,

"If the Russian Revolution had been accompanied by a revolution
in Germany
, the dramatic suddenness of the change might have shaken
Europe, for the moment, out of its habits of thought: the idea of fraternity
might have seemed
, in the twinkling of an eye, to have entered the
world of practical politics
; and no idea is so practical as the
idea of the brotherhood of man
, if only people can be startled into
believing in it. If once the idea of fraternity between nations were
inaugurated
with the faith and vigour belonging to a new revolution,
all the difficulties surrounding it would melt away, for all of them
are due to suspicion
and the tyranny of ancient prejudice. Those
who
(as is common in the English-speaking world) reject revolution
as a method
, and praise the gradual piecemeal development which (we
are told) constitutes solid progress, overlook the effect of dramatic
events in changing the mood and the beliefs
of whole populations. A
simultaneous revolution in Germany and Russia would
no doubt have
had such an effect, and would have made the creation of a new world possible

here and now." (Unwin paperback, London 1977, p. 120).

During the Cold War, Russell remained a major
advocate of World Government
. He promoted it in speeches, in books
such as Authority and the Individual (1949, p, 34), and especially
in his book Has Man a Future?, pp. 17-18, 23, 24-5, 72-6, 87, 94-5,
97, 122-4.

Russell and Wells imagined that they were leading the movement for World
Government; but behind the scenes were Rothschild and other minders.

Roland Perry discloses in his book The Fifth Man, how Rothschild
stayed close to Russell & other members of the Pugwash conferences
promoting convergence between the Soviet Union and the West:

"{p. 223} Rothschild assiduously kept contact with the key organizers
so that his involvement always seemed natural
.

"Correspondence with Russell in early 1955 was typical:

"Dear Russell, I would like to present the manuscript of
your recent broadcast dealing with the Hydrogen Bomb to Trinity. Can you
suggest any way in which I might acquire it? Yours Sincerely, Rothschild"

See perry.html (p. 223).

I do not maintain that Jewish political action is evil per se, as Nazis
do. It has brought benefits for the non-European peoples of the world,
whom the Europeans conquered. But if the truth about Bolshevism cannot
be told, especially its high connections within the British Establishment,
can we trust those same forces today?

The Cold War was won in the name of "Democracy", yet we have
no choice about Globalism because it is "inevitable". In George
Orwell’s vision of a future totalitarian state, 1984
, Goldstein,
the underground leader and Big Brother’s arch-enemy, was modelled on Trotsky
(Like Snowball in Animal Farm). Now, ironically, Hitler is the new
Goldstein: The Role of Hitler in the New World Order.

(4) World Federalism

David Ben Gurion, writing in 1962, predicted World Government by 1987.
Ben Gurion saw Eastern Europe being torn from the USSR and joined with
Western Europe; and China (even Mao’s China) and Japan joining the US in
what seems the first published depiction of APEC: writing
in LOOK magazine, Jan. 16, 1962 (scroll down to see text)
.

The World Government movement is often called "World Federalism"
or "Global Governance"; "interdependence" means much
the same
.

Here are some sites promoting it: (a) World Constitution and Parliament
Association: http://www.scruz.net/~tgilman/cnfdeart.dir/contents.html
(b) The Commission on Global Governance: http://www.cgg.ch/
(c) World Federalism FAQ Page: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6094/WFFAQ.html
(d) World Government Awareness Campaign: http://government.faithweb.com/list.html
(this links to many other NGOs pushing Global Governance, e.g. BAHA’I WORLD
http://www.bahai.org/; the Bahai faith
has its headquarters in Haifa, Israel) (e) Links to international NGOs
(Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch etc): http://www.politicalresources.net/int2.htm.

Here are some sites exposing it: (a) http://www.bilderberg.org/
(b) http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/worldgov.html
(c) (John Loeffler, Henry Lamb): http://www.khouse.org/articles/currentevents/20000701-264.html.

Strobe Talbot, Deputy Secretary of State under Clinton, promoting
World Federalism
(Time Magazine July 20, 1992): http://www.comeandtakeit.com/s-talbot.html.
Global goals of the Clinton administration (The Phyllis Schlafly Report):
http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/1997/oct97/psroct97.html.
Time Magazine November 3, 1997 on the Asia Crisis: "How to Kill a
Tiger" (how speculators killed the Asian Tigers): http://www.time.com/time/magazine/1997/int/971103/asia.how_to_kill_a.html.
Clinton’s Jewish cabinet: http://www.abbc2.com/islam/english/toread/clintjew.htm.
Clinton’s Jewish ambassadors: http://www.abbc2.com/islam/english/jewishp/jambas.htm.
Jewish oligarchs controlling Yeltsin’s Russia: http://abbc.com/islam/english/jewishp/russia/finan.htm.

(5) A World Court – the Politics of "Human Rights"

The Hague Tribunal judging Milosevic is a World Government initiative.
Ramsey Clark, former U.S. Attorney-General, is one brave American who has
rejected the blitzkrieg-for-human-rights methods of the New World Order
in Iraq & Yugoslavia.

The NWO destroyed Yugoslavia, a multicultural country; it began when
the IMF demanded repayment of loans, the amount of which is far less than
the cost of the damage caused to the shattered Balkans by the 10 years
of war since: http://www.emperors-clothes.com.

In his book The Open Conspiracy (1933),
H. G. Wells wrote, "The Open Conspiracy rests upon a disrespect
for nationality, and there is no reason why it should tolerate noxious
or obstructive governments because they hold their own in this or that
patch of human territory
" (p. 89).

The Gulf War was fought because Iraq invaded Kuwait’s sovereignty, yet
when Saddam invaded Iran, the US did not stop him – it sold him weapons.

Big Brother’s blitzkriegs and economic embargoes are justified in the
name of "Human Rights". But what are "Human Rights"?:
Deconstructing Human Rights.

Gore Vidal on the FBI’s holocaust at Waco: http://www.geocities.com/gorevidal3000/tim.htm.

(6) John Hewson, a Globalist, argues against Sovereignty

Hewson, an academic economist, led Australia’s Liberal Party (=Tory,
Republican) to the 1993 federal election. After losing, he quit.

The Australian Financial Review of May 31, 2002 published the
following article by Hewson.

{title} Dubya’s double standards

{subtitle} John Hewson, who is in China, writes the world must face
the reality of globalisation.

{text} Globalisation is inevitable. But the debate will rage for years
as to what it really means and what its consequences are.

{I am always intrigued by things that are ÒinevitableÓ.
Communism was, Christianity was, Islam was, Capitalism is. Is inevitability
compatible with Democracy, i.e. rule by the people?}

My guess is that few, if any, are really focusing on the magnitude of
the changes required to complete the process.

It’s a bit like the debate of the early 1970s about the formation of
a European common market. At the time, few would have really contemplated
the full extent of the potential integration and the loss of national sovereignty
with the formation of a single monetary policy and a single currency, the
euro.

The US should be leading this process but we are suffering from an appalling
lack of leadership. While spruiking the benefits of globalisation
and free trade, US President George Dubya imposes tariffs to protect
his steel industry and the Congress passes a reprehensible farm bill
.

The world is desperate for a new round of trade liberalisation, whether
individual countries recognise it or they don’t. Bush promises an American
free trade zone and initiates discussions with a range of other countries
for bilateral free trade agreements, yet he persists in protecting certain
industries for short-term political gain. The world needs his leadership,
but unfortunately it is not forthcoming.

We can all try to protect our favoured industries as much as we like,
but it is inevitable that the manufacturing base of the world will shift
to countries like China
. We can protect our manufacturing industries
only at the expense of our taxpayers. We are better off recognising where
our strengths lie, and supporting those industries, rather than trying
to protect the unprotectable.

If I take South Australia as an example, its strengths are not in manufacturing,
relative to a country like China, but it has a unique opportunity in education
and aged care and similar industries. There is no reason why South Australia
can’t be the Boston of the United States, in terms of funds management,
or the Phoenix of the United States, in terms of aged care. But government
policy has been intent on maintaining a manufacturing base which is, quite
frankly, unsustainable.

Globalisation will also require dramatic rationalisation of key industries
worldwide
. Take a couple of examples, airlines and telcos. The
real question in both cases is how many global companies will or should
survive. Yet individual governments see a national airline or a telco as
an essential status symbol
and are going to be most reluctant to
let go
.

The answer to that question is maybe three or four global telcos
and airlines
. The path to this rationalisation is going to be difficult
and painful in terms of national sovereignty, and again, it requires leadership.

Just consider the rationalisation in process of our airline industry.
Ansett has gone and Qantas and Air New Zealand must be one, despite statements
to the contrary this week. New Zealand will find this hard to accept. But,
as I have said many times, we should really operate as if New Zealand is
a state of Australia anyway. Sorry, Helen.

It’s essential to recognise the reality of the airline and telco industries.
These are highly competitive, low-margin businesses. Scale is everything.
And it must be global scale. As tough as it is for individual countries
to accept that they will not necessarily have their own airline and their
own telco, global rationalisation down to a few operators is the only
answer
. Smart governments will be attempting to prepare their electorates
for this reality rather than defending the indefensible.

Another area of major concern in terms of globalisation is labour
market mobility
. Rather than opening up, countries are closing down.
There are now something like 23 million identiified genuine refugees
sitting in camps around the world that no country will take, and anti-immigration
sentiment is growing in Europe and other parts of the world, including
Australia.

In a globalised world the flee flow of labour is at least as
important as the free flow of goods. While the world has made some progress
in terms of trade liberalisation, it is way behind in terms of the free
flow of people
.

Again, it’s a leadership question. George Dubya should use his coalition,
and/or the UN, to solve this refugee crisis. I guess it will take countries
to sit around a table and to allocate the existing refugees to do this.
At this stage, unfortunately, the process is being resisted. There is no
leadership.

There is also the issue of the Kyoto Protocol and the fact that
internationally we must have some agreement to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions
. In a globalised world we would all agree, because it is
so significant.

Again the US is stepping outside and Australia is ignorantly following.
Yet Kyoto is inevitahle and Australia has negotiated a great deal. It would
be absolutely foolish to not accept it.

¥ John Hewson is an investment banker, a company director and a
former leader of the Liberal Party.

{end of text}

(7) What the Kyoto Protocol could mean

The Sydney Morning Herald published the following article on
June 5, 2002.

{title} The new green house effect {by Anne Davies, Urban
Affairs Editor}

{text} The cost of the typical Australian home could rise by as much
as $111,000 if the nation was to meet its obligations to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, a conference of architects was told yesterday.

A lawyer and greenhouse expert, Ross Biair, told the Royal Australian
Institute of Architects that the cost of making the materials which went
into houses, such as bricks and con rete, was very energy-intensive.

If Australia adopted a carbon tax system to meet its Kyoto protocol
obligations, the housing sector would be hit hard.

Mr Blair said a $40-a-ton carbon tax would cause the cost of the average
house to rise by $37,000 to pay for the cost of the "embodied energy"
in the raw materials.

But other research bodies had said a carbon tax would need to be much
hiqher. At $120 a tonne, the cost of tine embodied energy would rise by
$111,000.

Anne Davies

{end of text}

Lets’s explore the consequences.

Fired Bricks and Concrete go up in price, making Mudbrick and Stone
houses more affordable – that is, Mudbrick and Stone houses in the rural
areas, where the raw materials are found & there’s no transport cost
to move these bulky materials.

All sorts of alternative housing could replace the current fad for Fired
Brick.

And people would shift out of the big cities, back to the land where
the materials are.

Could be a godsend!

Or would we end up using nuclear power instead of coal? Is this why
Japan signed up?

With energy more expensive, labour (i.e.) muscle would make a comeback.
China & India would gain a relative advantage.

(8) A Paradise In This World, by Leo Trotsky

An Address delivered to a Working Class audience on April 14th, 1918

British Socialist Party, London, 1920

{Trotsky predicts that the Bolshevik Revolution will spread to Germany,
thence to the whole world}

{p. 19} … The day, howver, will come, comrades, when that boiler will
blow up, and then the working class will get hold of an iron broom and
will start sweeping the dust out of all corners of the present German Empire,
and will do it vith German thoroughness and steadiness, so that our hearts
will rejoice watching them doing it.

But in the meantime we say: "We are passing through hard, strenuous
times, but we are prepared to suffer hunger, cold, rain and many other
calamities and misfortunes, because we are only part of the world working
class and are fighting for its complete emancipation. And we shall hold
out, comrades, and shall carry our fight to a successful end, we shall
repair the railways, the locomotives, we shall put production on a firm
hasis, put straight the food supply, do all that is necessary – if only
we keep in our bodies a cheerful mind and a strong stout heart. So long
as our soul is a living one, our Russian land is safe, and the Soviet republic
stands firm."

Let us then, comrades, remember and remind the less conscious of us,
that we stand as a city on the mount, and that the workers of all countries
look at us and ask themselves with bated breath, whether we shall tumble,
whether we shall fail, or stand our ground? And we, on our part, call out
to them: "We vow to you that we shall stand our ground, that we shall
not fail, that we shall remain in power to the end." But you, workers
of the other countries, you, brothers, do not exhaust our patience too
much, hurry up, stop the slaughter, overthrow the bourgeoisie, take the
power into your hands, and then we shall turn the whole globe into one
world re-

{p. 20} public of Labour. Al the earthly riches, all the lands
and all the seas
– all this shall be one common property of the
whole of humanity,
whatever the name of its parts: English, Russian,
French, German, etc. We shall create one brotherly state: the land which
nature gave us. This land we shall plough and cultivate on associative
principles, turn into one blossoming garden, where our chidren, grand-children,
and great-grand-children will live as in a paradise
. Time was when
people believed in legends which told of a paradise. These were vague and
confused dreams, the yearning of the soul of the oppressed Man after a
better life. There was the yearning after a purer, more righteous life,
and Man said: "There must be such a paradise, at least, in the ‘other’
world, an unknown and mysterious country." But we say, we shall
create such a paradise with our toiling hands here, in this world, upon
earth
, for all, for our children and grand children and for all eternity!
… {end}

However, just as Marx insisted that Christianity be judged by its practice
rather than its theory (theology), so Communism must be judged by its practice
not its rhetoric.

Write to me at contact.html.

HOME

Advertisements

About homelessholocaust

Tijuana Hobo , Hebrew Hobo Railroad Rabbi, The Truth Teller Tell True Truth Truthfully. If the Truth is Repugnant to you, You are a Reagan Cultist. Ronald Reagan was Taught by L. Ron Hubbard, Reagan & Hubbard FOUNDED THE SCIENCE FICTION MIND FUCKING GAME- SCIENTOLOGY- then REAGAN USED NERO LINGUIST PROGRAMMING as PRESIDENT to MURDER THE MINDS of AMERICANS!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s